
当全世界大部分人都在密切关注激烈的国际贸易战时,中国两家互联网巨头正在本土市场展开厮杀,给彼此造成巨大伤害。
京东集团(JD.com)发起了一场代价高昂的争夺战,试图从外卖行业龙头美团(Meituan)手中抢夺市场份额,而后者则在不断侵蚀前者在电商领域的大本营。两家公司在香港上市的股价自3月高点以来均下跌约30%,合计市值蒸发约700亿美元。
投资者正准备迎接一场旷日持久的斗争,这场较量将冲击双方的盈利水平。分析师已下调两家公司的股票目标价,期权市场的防御性头寸也在增加。
瑞士盈丰资产管理(香港)有限公司(EFG Asset Management HK Ltd.)的基金经理黛西·李表示:“短期内两家公司的情况都将更加恶化,目前尚不清楚这场战役将持续多久。”她补充说,中国外卖市场的白热化竞争将损害行业盈利能力。
尽管唐纳德·特朗普的关税政策削弱了中国科技股近期的反弹动能,但这场本土竞争所造成的影响依旧备受关注。美团和京东名列恒生科技指数今年表现最差的八只成分股,而2024年两家公司的表现还处于指数排名的上半区。
这种转变源于京东今年2月执行了烧钱策略,正式推出“京东秒送”(JD Takeaway)外卖平台。总部位于北京的京东宣布为消费者提供超14亿美元的折扣优惠,为部分商家免除佣金,并计划招聘10万名全职配送骑手。
摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase & Co.)估算,京东已占据中国外卖市场约5%的份额。此前外卖市场基本由美团(约占75%)和阿里巴巴集团(Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.)旗下的饿了么(Ele.me)(约占25%)瓜分。该经纪商估计,以当前规模计算,京东秒送可能产生高达180亿元人民币(合25亿美元)的年化亏损,将抹去母公司2025年36%的经营利润。
分析师艾利克斯·姚在上周二的报告中写道:“鉴于对集团损益表的财务影响,我们认为这不是一项可持续的战略。通过深度补贴的增长战略来获取可观市场份额,对新进入者而言成本之高令人却步。”
美团曾成功抵御了外卖领域的竞争,但凭借现成的配送网络,京东被视为是一个强大的挑战者。与此同时,美团今年也开始进军京东核心的快速商务领域、电脑和电子产品等。
虽然两家公司都高度依赖中国消费市场,但美团正通过其Keeta应用大举投资拓展海外外卖业务。
Hedgeye Risk Management全球科技与软件主管菲力克斯·王表示:“京东在中国已没有太多增长机会,海外布局也极为有限。”在此背景下,其代价高昂的京东秒送攻势更像是防御之举,“不完全是为了开拓外卖业务”。
随着冲突持续,卖方分析师态度日趋谨慎。尽管两家公司的股票仍获得压倒性的买入评级,但美团平均目标价较3月高点下跌8%,京东则下挫约4%。
对冲两只股票下跌风险的成本仍远高于一年平均水平。对京东而言,看跌期权与看涨期权的未平仓合约比率已飙升至去年8月以来的最高水平,使其成为港股市场上看空倾向最严重的股票之一。 (财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
当全世界大部分人都在密切关注激烈的国际贸易战时,中国两家互联网巨头正在本土市场展开厮杀,给彼此造成巨大伤害。
京东集团(JD.com)发起了一场代价高昂的争夺战,试图从外卖行业龙头美团(Meituan)手中抢夺市场份额,而后者则在不断侵蚀前者在电商领域的大本营。两家公司在香港上市的股价自3月高点以来均下跌约30%,合计市值蒸发约700亿美元。
投资者正准备迎接一场旷日持久的斗争,这场较量将冲击双方的盈利水平。分析师已下调两家公司的股票目标价,期权市场的防御性头寸也在增加。
瑞士盈丰资产管理(香港)有限公司(EFG Asset Management HK Ltd.)的基金经理黛西·李表示:“短期内两家公司的情况都将更加恶化,目前尚不清楚这场战役将持续多久。”她补充说,中国外卖市场的白热化竞争将损害行业盈利能力。
尽管唐纳德·特朗普的关税政策削弱了中国科技股近期的反弹动能,但这场本土竞争所造成的影响依旧备受关注。美团和京东名列恒生科技指数今年表现最差的八只成分股,而2024年两家公司的表现还处于指数排名的上半区。
这种转变源于京东今年2月执行了烧钱策略,正式推出“京东秒送”(JD Takeaway)外卖平台。总部位于北京的京东宣布为消费者提供超14亿美元的折扣优惠,为部分商家免除佣金,并计划招聘10万名全职配送骑手。
摩根大通(JPMorgan Chase & Co.)估算,京东已占据中国外卖市场约5%的份额。此前外卖市场基本由美团(约占75%)和阿里巴巴集团(Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.)旗下的饿了么(Ele.me)(约占25%)瓜分。该经纪商估计,以当前规模计算,京东秒送可能产生高达180亿元人民币(合25亿美元)的年化亏损,将抹去母公司2025年36%的经营利润。
分析师艾利克斯·姚在上周二的报告中写道:“鉴于对集团损益表的财务影响,我们认为这不是一项可持续的战略。通过深度补贴的增长战略来获取可观市场份额,对新进入者而言成本之高令人却步。”
美团曾成功抵御了外卖领域的竞争,但凭借现成的配送网络,京东被视为是一个强大的挑战者。与此同时,美团今年也开始进军京东核心的快速商务领域、电脑和电子产品等。
虽然两家公司都高度依赖中国消费市场,但美团正通过其Keeta应用大举投资拓展海外外卖业务。
Hedgeye Risk Management全球科技与软件主管菲力克斯·王表示:“京东在中国已没有太多增长机会,海外布局也极为有限。”在此背景下,其代价高昂的京东秒送攻势更像是防御之举,“不完全是为了开拓外卖业务”。
随着冲突持续,卖方分析师态度日趋谨慎。尽管两家公司的股票仍获得压倒性的买入评级,但美团平均目标价较3月高点下跌8%,京东则下挫约4%。
对冲两只股票下跌风险的成本仍远高于一年平均水平。对京东而言,看跌期权与看涨期权的未平仓合约比率已飙升至去年8月以来的最高水平,使其成为港股市场上看空倾向最严重的股票之一。 (财富中文网)
译者:刘进龙
审校:汪皓
While much of the world is focused on a volatile international trade war, two of China’s largest internet companies are inflicting greater damage on each other at home.
JD.com Inc. has launched a costly battle to steal market share away from food-delivery leader Meituan, while the latter has been encroaching on the former’s e-commerce stronghold. The companies’ Hong Kong-listed stocks have dropped about 30% each from March highs, shedding around $70 billion in combined market value.
Investors are bracing for a prolonged struggle that will hurt earnings for the pair. Analysts have cut price targets for both stocks, and defensive positioning has ramped up in the options market.
“Both sides are worse off in the near term, and it’s unclear how long this battle will last,” said Daisy Li, a fund manager at EFG Asset Management HK Ltd. The intense level of competition in the Chinese food-delivery market will damage profitability, she added.
Even as Donald Trump’s tariffs have taken steam out of the recent China tech rally, the impact of this domestic rivalry stands out. Meituan and JD.com rank among the worst eight performers on the Hang Seng Tech Index this year after both were in the top half in 2024.
The switch came as JD.com deployed a cash-burning strategy to promote its JD Takeaway food platform, which was officially launched in February. The Beijing-based company has announced over $1.4 billion in discounts for consumers, waved commission fees for some merchants and aims to hire 100,000 full-time delivery riders.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. estimates JD.com has taken about 5% share of China’s food delivery market, which was previously divided at about 75% for Meituan and 25% for Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.’s Ele.me. The brokerage estimates that at the current scale, JD Takeaway could generate up to 18 billion yuan ($2.5 billion) in annualized losses, wiping out 36% of its parent’s operating profit for 2025.
“We don’t think this is a sustainable strategy because of the financial impact on group P&L,” analyst Alex Yao wrote in a note Tuesday. “It is cost prohibitive for a new entrant to gain significant market share in China’s food delivery market through a deeply subsidized growth strategy.”
Meituan has successfully fended off food-delivery competition in the past, but JD.com is seen as a formidable challenger given its existing delivery network. At the same time, Meituan made inroads this year into JD.com’s core quick-commerce field, computer and electronics products.
While both firms are heavily reliant on Chinese consumption, Meituan has been spending aggressively on expansion into overseas food delivery through its Keeta app.
“JD doesn’t have many growth opportunities left in China, and has very little overseas exposure,” said Felix Wang, head of global technology & software at Hedgeye Risk Management. In this context, its costly JD Takeaway foray is more of a defensive move and “not entirely about food delivery.”
Sell-side analysts have turned more cautious as the skirmish drags on. Though both stocks are overwhelmingly buy rated, the average price target for Meituan is down 8% from a March high, and JD.com’s has dipped about 4%.
The costs of hedging against declines in both stocks remain far above their one-year averages. For JD.com, the ratio of outstanding bearish-to-bullish options has surged to its highest level since August, ranking among the most negatively skewed Hong Kong stocks.